Jeff Burdges
2016-05-05 23:32:50 UTC
I noticed WhatsApp says "WhatsApp can only be activated with one phone
number on one device at a time." here :
https://www.whatsapp.com/faq/general/24460358
Is this really correct? I presume Signal works like this?
How is this enforced? Is there only one copy of the ratchet allowed per
contact? Or is there only one copy of a user's long-term key allowed
per account? The second offers a stronger security assurance.
It makes perfect sense because using a third party identification method
like phone number is incompatible with multi-device chat :
If a phone is stolen, then either (a) WhatsApp/Signal must provide a
method for deauthorizing that device, or (b) you cannot even keep the
same WhatsApp/Signal account, and hence cannot even keep your phone
number. It's obvious that (a) is preferable to (b), but the question
remains : Should deauthorizing a device be a power user feature? Or
should everyone get that assurance by limiting the system to one device
per account? That's actually a false question because even the power
user needs their inexperienced contacts to deauthorize them correctly.
Ergo, no multi-device support for messengers that use phone numbers.
Anyways, I'm pleasantly surprised this is the case, just curious how
strong the assurances go.
Jeff
number on one device at a time." here :
https://www.whatsapp.com/faq/general/24460358
Is this really correct? I presume Signal works like this?
How is this enforced? Is there only one copy of the ratchet allowed per
contact? Or is there only one copy of a user's long-term key allowed
per account? The second offers a stronger security assurance.
It makes perfect sense because using a third party identification method
like phone number is incompatible with multi-device chat :
If a phone is stolen, then either (a) WhatsApp/Signal must provide a
method for deauthorizing that device, or (b) you cannot even keep the
same WhatsApp/Signal account, and hence cannot even keep your phone
number. It's obvious that (a) is preferable to (b), but the question
remains : Should deauthorizing a device be a power user feature? Or
should everyone get that assurance by limiting the system to one device
per account? That's actually a false question because even the power
user needs their inexperienced contacts to deauthorize them correctly.
Ergo, no multi-device support for messengers that use phone numbers.
Anyways, I'm pleasantly surprised this is the case, just curious how
strong the assurances go.
Jeff